Re: fc7 i386, yum and explicit dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed June 6 2007 10:14:13 Denis Leroy wrote:
> Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:49:44 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> >> This is quite similar to a report I got about cinelerra from freshrpms
> >> not running. The user installed it with yum, but managed to get broken
> >> dependencies because of different ffmpeg packages from rpm.livna.org
> >> and freshrpms somehow...
> >
> > Media packages from livna and freshrpms do not mix, im my experience.
>
> No but i think that's a different problem. Here we're seeing systems
> left with broken deps after a successful yum installation.

more evidence in this thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-June/msg00745.html


...dex



		
___________________________________________________________ 
Inbox full of spam? Get leading spam protection and 1GB storage with All New Yahoo! Mail. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux