Re: fc7 i386, yum and explicit dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/6/07, Denis Leroy <denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:49:44 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
>
>> This is quite similar to a report I got about cinelerra from freshrpms
>> not running. The user installed it with yum, but managed to get broken
>> dependencies because of different ffmpeg packages from rpm.livna.org
>> and freshrpms somehow...
>
> Media packages from livna and freshrpms do not mix, im my experience.

No but i think that's a different problem. Here we're seeing systems
left with broken deps after a successful yum installation.

Right, that also explains why I got this bug report,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242233

Deji.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux