On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:18:57 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> I have been wanting to see a VDE2 package for Fedora for a while now
> and so I took a little time to write a spec file for it. I have used it
> to build fc6 i386 (my platform) RPMS/SRPM. Not sure if the fedora-devel
> list is where I should submit these but I would like to contribute these
> to Fedora as I think in light of increased QEMU usage that this would be
> of interest to the general community and is a good candidate for having
> it included in Fedora directly.
>
> Gerry
A few findings:
> Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4), rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1, libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1), libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0), libvde2, libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3), rtld(GNU_HASH), rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1, libvdeplug.so.2, libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3), libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
>
Drop all these. They are automatically found and added by rpm-build.
> # do not end description with a ./dot/period
Why not?
> %package -n %{libname}-devel
> Summary: VDE development libraries
> Group: Development/Other
Requires: %libname = %version-%release
is missing here.
> %files -n %{libname}
> %{_libdir}/libvde*.so.*
%defattr is missing here.
> %files -n %{libname}-devel
%defattr is missing here.
> %{_includedir}/libvde*.h
> %{_libdir}/libvde*.so
> %{_libdir}/libvde*.*a
> %{_libdir}/vde2/libvde*.so
> %{_libdir}/vde2/libvde*.*a
%dir %{_libdir}/vde2
is missing here. The *.*a wildcards ought to be adjusted as not to
include static libraries.
%post -n %{libname} -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -n %{libname} -p /sbin/ldconfig
are missing.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
