On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 10:41 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007 10:53:39 Hans de Goede wrote: > > I do not expect anyone to update all niche pages of the wiki, but is it to > > much to ask to update a very important often consulted page like: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess > > > > When there are workflow changes? Sure in about a week, when I hopefully > > truely understand how bodhi works, I could edit it myself. But I would > > expect the people introducing such changes to atleast show some minimal > > effort to keep the most important pages of the wiki under the > > PackageMaintainers/ hierarchy up to date. > > Do be perfectly honest, I didn't know this page really existed. I lost track > of all the wiki places things were documented long ago, and since I knew how > to do things I never looked it up. I hate to say it, but we need another > wiki page (: One that covers the tasks of issuing changes to workflow. Way > back when I was a member of a change control board, and there was > Representatives from various parts of the company and they would make sure > your change draft covered everything they needed, and that would include > changing the proper wiki page in this case. > > Could not FESCO function in this way as well? Changes require a draft, draft > would include things like updating the proper wiki pages when the change goes > into effect, and things like a rollback plan. Can we discuss this at our > next FESCO meeting? Sounds like a good idea. I'll add it to the schedule. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
