On Sunday 03 June 2007 10:53:39 Hans de Goede wrote: > I do not expect anyone to update all niche pages of the wiki, but is it to > much to ask to update a very important often consulted page like: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess > > When there are workflow changes? Sure in about a week, when I hopefully > truely understand how bodhi works, I could edit it myself. But I would > expect the people introducing such changes to atleast show some minimal > effort to keep the most important pages of the wiki under the > PackageMaintainers/ hierarchy up to date. Do be perfectly honest, I didn't know this page really existed. I lost track of all the wiki places things were documented long ago, and since I knew how to do things I never looked it up. I hate to say it, but we need another wiki page (: One that covers the tasks of issuing changes to workflow. Way back when I was a member of a change control board, and there was Representatives from various parts of the company and they would make sure your change draft covered everything they needed, and that would include changing the proper wiki page in this case. Could not FESCO function in this way as well? Changes require a draft, draft would include things like updating the proper wiki pages when the change goes into effect, and things like a rollback plan. Can we discuss this at our next FESCO meeting? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpiVAvYwmFRU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
