On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:09:43 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > BTW, why wasn't this PPC64 problem found earlier? Because communication about ppc64 was very much unprecise. fedora-maintainers has had a few vague threads, but after the latest one in May, it took an unknown time for rawhide to become available. Adding to that, the rawhide report's own broken deps checker was disabled without notice. > Wasn't repoclosure run for ppc64? Not until somebody asked me whether it could be done as a work-around. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
