On 03.06.2007 14:53, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007 06:43:10 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> @rel-eng: please remove gsynaptics from the PPC64 devel tree until >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242323 (synaptics >> missing for ppc64) is solved somehow. >> >> I assume packages from the released tree for F7 are not removed even if >> broken? Then I'll likely have to ignore that report until above bug is >> solved somehow. >> >> CU >> knurd >> >> /me for doesn't add a "ExcludeArch: ppc64" to gsynaptics in the hope to >> get a reply to the bug soon > > We don't remove things from the release tree. I expected that. Then this will be broken until a synaptics for ppc64 shows up (if that happens) in Fedora 7 updates. That's life. BTW, why wasn't this PPC64 problem found earlier? Wasn't repoclosure run for ppc64? Do we expect that to be a problem that only happens due to the new ppc64 tree or is there anything we should do to prevent similar stuff in the future? > Why wouldn't you just exclude for now instead of dropping the package all > together? Work on the 242323 bug as best you can and once it's done > re-enable ppc64? Well, I could do that for devel, then the ppc64 version would vanish. But rebuilding something just to get rid of something never should have been build sounds crazy when those with access to the repo can do a simple "rm foo". It's devel in any case; waiting some days might be the best for now. CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
