On 03.06.2007 15:17, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007 02:48:35 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Well, see all those discussion that happened when ACLs were added, kjoi >> introduced, the freezes were introduced and bodi put in place. Sure, >> there are always discussions, but all those were quite worse and there >> was a lot of confusion afaics... Don't read fedora-maintainers for a >> week and suddenly you are not aware of how to build or push a package. > So without reading the mailing list for maintainers, A low-traffic fedora-maintainers-announce was requested multiple times as some contributors mentioned that fedora-maintainers is to noisy for them. Some Red-Hat-engineers blocked that so long and hard that people that wanted it got frustrated and didn't drive that idea further in the past months. Like it or not, but for some people fedora-maintainers has to much traffic; so they just skim over it and easily miss important announcements. > [...] BTW, we are getting side-tracked. I didn't want to bring the fedora-maintainers-announce stuff into the game. I meant the lack of proper docs, rules and procedure for the start of some of those techniques needed for the merge as the problem. Cu thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
