Re: mdraid and hpa upgrade issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 2:06 PM -0500 5/25/07, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 14:55:24 -0400,
>  Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> At 12:40 PM -0400 5/25/07, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>  ...
>> >This late in the game, looks like we're going to stick with what we've
>> >got right now, which is HPA respected by default, and the ability to
>> >override it at install time if the installer is booted with
>> >libata.ignore_hpa=1. First go 'round, those with partitions in the hpa
>> >are going to get an ugly error message, but we'll stick something in
>> >F7KnownIssues (or whatever it is) like we did for FC6 documenting the
>> >work-around.
>>
>> That workaround works here.  I tried the Rescue CD (thanks, Bruno!) and
>> dmesg shows that with "libata.ignore_hpa=1" added to the command line the
>> hpa is disabled.  I don't know what else I can do to test Anaconda from the
>> rescue CD -- perhaps start an HTTP install from, umm, somewhere?
>
>You could try using rawhide. I don't know for sure that they are tagged
>the same, but I did see that everything in rawhide changed last night.

That seemed to work OK.
-- 
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux