Re: mdraid and hpa upgrade issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:58:53PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> options libata libata.ignore_hpa=1
> 
> Then upgrade via yum. Sub-optimal for those who prefer to upgrade via 
> anaconda, but its an option.
> 
> >How serious a problem results from doing an installer upgrade from FCx to
> >F7, no repartitioning?  Is it going to cause massive data loss for
> >unsuspecting users, or does the Anaconda notice and stop the process?

>From the testing done so far by our able advanced guard (aka Ubuntu ;))
we can probably safely default to ignore_hpa=1 which neatly side steps both
problems. The Nvidiot SAT bug ws probably the last real problem with it.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux