Re: mdraid and hpa upgrade issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:40:46 -0400,
  Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This late in the game, looks like we're going to stick with what we've 
> got right now, which is HPA respected by default, and the ability to 
> override it at install time if the installer is booted with 
> libata.ignore_hpa=1. First go 'round, those with partitions in the hpa 
> are going to get an ugly error message, but we'll stick something in 
> F7KnownIssues (or whatever it is) like we did for FC6 documenting the 
> work-around.

Maybe we could get setmax into extras. It seems like a tool people might
have use for.

I built it and used it read only and it seemed to work. I got some warnings
about exit because it is missing:
#include <stdlib.h>
But otherwise it compiled cleanly.
I didn't want to try set an HPA on any of my drives, to see if that worked.
I also tested in of FC5, not F7.

I didn't see a license on the page where it is distributed, so someone
would have to check with Brouwer or rewrite it.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux