Re: What happen to Wireshark?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:30 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> Oh yeah... I've had a long and sorted history with
> tcpdump.. The main problem is if you don't specify the
> correct arguments, the binary trace it produces is useless
> because it does not capture enough of the packet...
> and lets not even start to talk about what protocols
> it does *not* support... :-)

I didn't think that the packet dissection code in tcpdump had anything
to do with writing out a packet capture file.  What packets does
"tcpdump -s 0 -w packets.cap eth0" fail to write to the file?

Jeff

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux