On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 09:19 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le Mer 23 mai 2007 01:26, Jeremy Katz a écrit : > > Sounds like it might work. And while /usr/kde3.5 (or whatever) is > > somewhat breaking the FHS, > > "somewhat" breaking. Yes, sure. > Is avoiding conflicts in *devel* packages for *compat* stuff suddenly > worth breaking conventions? Seems just digging ourselves deeper in the > mess to me. If it's compat stuff that we expect users to care about and with a good sized audience (as opposed to something like compat-plib where the audience is pretty small), yes, it may well be worth it. I'd far rather things just get resolved nicely upstream, though. Don't get me wrong there Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
