On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 20:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Once upon a time Wednesday 16 May 2007, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > (*) admittedly than wasn't thrilled about such a non-trivial change going > > > in at such a late-date, starting at: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239701#c35 > > > > And you went ahead and did it anyway? "I'll do it anyway" flippancy > > especially from long time contributors is not going to encourage ex-Core > > package maintainers to want to add others to the ACL/co-maintainers > > lists for the packages they own. Than should retain a certain level of > > respect and I support his decision in this case. > > The way Than has not participated makes him more a co-maintainer than > maintainer. in all honesty he is lucky to have any access to the kde > packages at all right now. We had to drag him kicking and screaming to work > with the community. Right now i'm willing to have him removed from all > Fedora KDE access. Yeah, this kind of talk is sure to close doors for community participation in maintenance of core packages. Last I looked, hostile takeovers of packages were not part of the accepted norms in Fedora. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
