Re: kernel package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/11/2007 02:03 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
[ ... ]
+%ifarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev67

instead of listing all the alpha arches everywhere, you should define a
macro like %{all_alpha}

Sure. Go with it.

[ ... ]

+# 700 - 799   alpha
+Patch701: linux-2.6-no_fec_for_alpha.patch

Where's this?

See my other mail.

 #
 # Patches 800 through 899 are reserved for bugfixes to the core system
 # and patches related to how RPMs are build
@@ -1001,7 +1024,9 @@
 # Patches 10 through 100 are meant for core subsystem upgrades
# Roland's utrace ptrace replacement.
+%ifnarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev67
 %patch10 -p1
+%endif

Is utrace really broken on alpha?

As already stated. I can build it without the ifnarch and send you the error - will take a while of course. My DS10 is quite fast, but not *very* fast...

[ ... ]

See also the notes from my previous mail.

-of

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux