On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 13:01 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Readable diff attached. And the answer (at least from me) is no -- I'm
> not happy about applying it with all the ifdefs. We can apply the clean
> bits though -- obviously it won't actually build, but then we can set
> about actually _fixing_ exec-shield, etc.
>
> Can you explain each ifarch? And show Patch701? Why at the end?
>
> Once upon a time the folks at HP were threatening to send me SMP Alpha
> boxen -- not sure if I could still pull that off...
>
> Index: kernel-2.6.spec
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel-2.6.spec,v
> retrieving revision 1.3148
> diff -u -r1.3148 kernel-2.6.spec
> --- kernel-2.6.spec 10 May 2007 23:26:42 -0000 1.3148
> +++ kernel-2.6.spec 11 May 2007 11:57:12 -0000
> @@ -167,6 +167,16 @@
> %define usesparse 0
> %endif
>
> +%ifarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev67
instead of listing all the alpha arches everywhere, you should define a
macro like %{all_alpha}
> # To temporarily exclude an architecture from being built, add it to
> # %nobuildarches. Do _NOT_ use the ExclusiveArch: line, because if we
> # don't build kernel-headers then the new build system will no longer let
> @@ -290,13 +307,13 @@
> Group: System Environment/Kernel
> License: GPLv2
> Version: %{rpmversion}
> -Release: %{release}
> +Release: %{release}axp
Shouldn't need to muck with Release
> %if 0%{?olpc}
> ExclusiveArch: i386 i586
> %else
> # DO NOT CHANGE THIS LINE TO TEMPORARILY EXCLUDE AN ARCHITECTURE BUILD.
> # SET %nobuildarches (ABOVE) INSTEAD
> -ExclusiveArch: noarch %{all_x86} x86_64 ppc ppc64 ia64 sparc sparc64 s390 s390x
> +ExclusiveArch: noarch %{all_x86} x86_64 ppc ppc64 ia64 sparc sparc64 s390 s390x alpha alphaev6 alphaev67
> %endif
> ExclusiveOS: Linux
> Provides: kernel-drm = 4.3.0
> @@ -363,6 +380,9 @@
> #Source67: kernel-%{kversion}-sparc64.config
> #Source68: kernel-%{kversion}-sparc64-smp.config
>
> +Source50: kernel-%{kversion}-alpha.config
> +Source50: kernel-%{kversion}-alpha-smp.config
Do you need an alpha-smp.config since you turned smp builds off?
> +# 700 - 799 alpha
> +Patch701: linux-2.6-no_fec_for_alpha.patch
Where's this?
> #
> # Patches 800 through 899 are reserved for bugfixes to the core system
> # and patches related to how RPMs are build
> @@ -1001,7 +1024,9 @@
> # Patches 10 through 100 are meant for core subsystem upgrades
>
> # Roland's utrace ptrace replacement.
> +%ifnarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev67
> %patch10 -p1
> +%endif
Is utrace really broken on alpha?
> # Exec shield
> +%ifnarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev6
> %patch810 -p1
> +%endif
>
> #
> # GPG signed kernel modules
> @@ -1181,7 +1208,9 @@
> %patch1018 -p1
> %patch1019 -p1
> %patch1020 -p1
> +%ifnarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev6
> %patch1021 -p1
> +%endif
Does this patch not apply, or doesn't work, or?
> %patch1022 -p1
> %if %{includexen}
> %patch1023 -p1
> @@ -1198,7 +1227,9 @@
> #
> # /dev/crash driver for the crashdump analysis tool
> #
> +%ifnarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev67
> %patch1060 -p1
> +%endif
Same thing here
> %if %{includexen}
> %patch1061 -p1
> %endif
> @@ -1258,7 +1289,9 @@
> # DVB spinlock bug
> %patch1700 -p1
> # setuid /proc/self/maps fix.
> +%ifnarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev67
> %patch1720 -p1
> +%endif
> # Add a safety net to softlockup so that it doesn't prevent installs.
> %patch1740 -p1
> # Speed up spinlock debug.
> @@ -1346,7 +1379,9 @@
> #
>
> # Pull in the new firewire stack
> +%ifnarch alpha alphaev5 alphaev56 alphaev6 alphaev67
> %patch5000 -p1
> +%endif
Same thing here
josh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
