On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 22:36 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > Retired packages have been around since day one (well, day two really > but you know what I mean...) and "Depends on a legacy library that no > longer ships in Fedora" is just one of a long list of reasons (*cough* > xmms *cough*). Yeah, next time I'm at the watering hole, I'll have to hoist one in memory of Fedora Legacy. And not shipping multimedia components that are illegal in the US is a lot more palatable than not shipping a product because it's inconvenient to package a dependency. > The cleanest thing to do is document it ASAP so that people using said > packages can have as much time as possible to find alternate solutions > (whether that be moving to another distribution, joining forces to > maintain a third party repo or anything else), IMHO. I doubt that there'll be a problem finding a repo that will host Zope. And, I think that we're getting the word out now. Dave -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
