David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:09 +0200, dragoran wrote:
thx for mentioning this I suggest that any package that create avcs
should not pass a review. We have suchs packages in extras and nothing
in the review process takes care of selinux integration which is wrong.
Yes, that makes sense. Although the SElinux experts do a great job of
cleaning up after us, we should strive to ensure that package
maintainers take responsibility for their own packages rather than
_just_ dumping the load onto others.
+1
but it would be better to clean up before aproving a package (if a
selinux expert is needed cc one in the review request)
we should do something like "works with selinux enforcing ->no please
fix first" during the review
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
