Re: Selinux and package guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:09 +0200, dragoran wrote:
thx for mentioning this I suggest that any package that create avcs should not pass a review. We have suchs packages in extras and nothing in the review process takes care of selinux integration which is wrong.

Yes, that makes sense. Although the SElinux experts do a great job of
cleaning up after us, we should strive to ensure that package
maintainers take responsibility for their own packages rather than
_just_ dumping the load onto others.

+1
but it would be better to clean up before aproving a package (if a selinux expert is needed cc one in the review request) we should do something like "works with selinux enforcing ->no please fix first" during the review

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux