Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2007-05-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:42:34PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 
> > I know it is pretty bad to break sonames that late in the release
> > cycle, but I updated the whole dap stack while fixing a security
> > issue. I also notified Cristian by mail.
> 
> Which apparently was possible to fix for FC-6 without an upgrade of libdap:
> 
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview/libdap.html
> 
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview/dap-server.html

Indeed, but I wanted to avoid having an old version of libdap through 
F7, and since I updated dap-server I took the opportunity to update
the whole stack.

> Does gdal rebuild without problems?
> Has that been tried?

No. Indeed I should have tried. I'll try now.

> Library package owners really need to negotiate with owners of dependencies
> about the possibility to submit simple rebuilds themeselves.

I proposed that to Cristian.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux