On Sat, 5 May 2007 12:19:50 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:32:42PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 02 May 2007 16:53:48 -0000, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote: > > > > > Summary of broken packages (by owner): > > > > > > cbalint AT redhat.com > > > gdal - 1.4.0-22.fc7.i386 > > > gdal - 1.4.0-22.fc7.ppc > > > gdal - 1.4.0-22.fc7.x86_64 > > > > Not yet. But the "dap" updates in needsign will break it. > > I know it is pretty bad to break sonames that late in the release > cycle, but I updated the whole dap stack while fixing a security > issue. I also notified Cristian by mail. Which apparently was possible to fix for FC-6 without an upgrade of libdap: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview/libdap.html http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview/dap-server.html Does gdal rebuild without problems? Has that been tried? Library package owners really need to negotiate with owners of dependencies about the possibility to submit simple rebuilds themeselves. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
