Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On 5/4/07, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > P.S.:Packagemonkey sounds bad and we should not use the term IMHO. >> >> It's a term which is precisely suited to the task. Nobody seemed to >> offer a better one last time I asked. > > I don't mind if you call me packagemonkey :) > However I think "Packager" would be quite enough to convey the same > meaning. You know how they all point and go HUSSS!!! in the film "Invasion of the Bodysnatchers" http://imdb.com/title/tt0077745/ Well it's sort of like that except they turn you into Jeff Johnson. But let's face it: "packager" is more neutral. Or at least packagehuman. -Andy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
