Re: about maintainers and packagemonkeys (was: Re: rpms/ocsinventory-client/devel ocsinventory-client.spec, 1.7, 1.8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 16:21 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On 5/4/07, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > P.S.:Packagemonkey sounds bad and we should not use the term IMHO.
> >
> > It's a term which is precisely suited to the task. Nobody seemed to
> > offer a better one last time I asked.
> 
> I don't mind if you call me packagemonkey :)
> However I think "Packager" would be quite enough to convey the same meaning.

Maybe JuniorPackager :-)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux