Re: repotag in EPEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter schrieb:
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>
> Regardless, (correct me if I'm wrong), but I thought that the EPEL SIG was
> to only make the *policy* decision on yes/no to repotag, and leave the
> implementation details to others (like FPC). ???

Well, I for one (as a member of the EPEL Steering Committee in this
case) don't want to vote on something if I don't know yet what the
consequences will be for packagers and users of EPEL, as the decision
how to technically realize what we voted on gets done by a different
group/committee.

Thus stuff like this needs somehow be decided by EPEL and the FPC
together IMHO. That why I started this thread. If something got worked
out that looks as being like acceptable for both groups involved *then*
I think the time has come for both Steering Committees to vote and
realize it.

CU
thl

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux