Re: repotag in EPEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:42:55AM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > >   denyhosts-2.6-4.el5.epel.noarch.rpm
> > el5.epel still seems a bit redundant. Why not just forget the repotag 
> > and set the dist tag to epel5?
> Other distros separate what is called the disttag from the repotag
> (different concepts, the first is which distro version the package is
> built for, the second is which repository the package belongs to), it
> would be nice to keep that in epel so that it is compatible with
> preexisting usage. 

So, really, we want %repotag to be ".el" and %dist to be "5"?

Alternately, the repotag should be _hard coded_ in the spec file. (For
better or worse.)


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux