On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 23:33 +0200, Sebastian Vahl wrote: > Hi. > > We (KDE-SIG) want to include one of these partitionin tools. > qtparted would be the best choice because it is qt. But personally I've > only used gparted the last time (years). For me it was working better. > > Also the described functionality differs: > gparted: http://gparted.sourceforge.net/features.php > qtparted: http://qtparted.sourceforge.net/features.en.html > > So the question here is: Are there good reasons for choosing qtparted > instead of gparted? Or is gtparted equal in functionality? > 1. gparted works better. (Though in qtparted's defense, it's been a while since I tested it) 2. Most rescue CD's use gtparted so people will most likely be accustomed to its UI. 3. gtk-qt should close the look-and-feel gap. - Gilboa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
