Re: KDE-LiveCD: gparted or qtparted?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:35:41 -0500
schrieb Callum Lerwick <seg@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 23:33 +0200, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> > So the question here is: Are there good reasons for choosing
> > qtparted instead of gparted? Or is gtparted equal in functionality?
> 
> SystemRescueCd switched from qtparted to gparted because qtparted went
> unmaintained since 2004. It appears it has recently been resurrected
> by Ark Linux though. gparted still seems to be ahead as far as
> functionality at the moment.

Mh. That would be a strong argument for gparted. Thanks.

Sebastian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux