Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 14:29:56 Robin Norwood wrote: >> I'd rather not go out with the current situation of perl Require-ing >> perl-devel - just too much of a hack. I admit I should've gotten this >> straightened out earlier, but since it's a packaging change, likely to >> affect a small group of package builders, I think the impact will be low >> enough to bear the risk of going ahead with this. > > But is it any different than Perl releases of past? As far as bits-on-the-disk, not really - they are just now in two packages that Require each other. The next set of changes splits things out further so that 'devel'-related perl bits don't have to be on a system unless you want them to be, which will be an actual improvement. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
