On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:31 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 14:29:56 Robin Norwood wrote: > > I'd rather not go out with the current situation of perl Require-ing > > perl-devel - just too much of a hack. I admit I should've gotten this > > straightened out earlier, but since it's a packaging change, likely to > > affect a small group of package builders, I think the impact will be low > > enough to bear the risk of going ahead with this. > > But is it any different than Perl releases of past? Only in that it's explicitly called perl-devel and so people ask why a -devel package is being installed on their system when they haven't asked for development stuff[1] Jeremy [1] And this has already been asked... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
