On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 22:04 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:48 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Steven Bakker wrote: > >>> Licensee) For non-commercial, open-source or educational use and > >>> JpGraph Professional License for commercial use. > >>> > >>> So QPL applies for (non-commercial || open-source || educational) use. > >>> I'd say Fedora fits in the "open-source" category. > >> I would read that as "no commercial open source" || "educational", otherwise > >> it makes no sense. Commercial and open source are not exclusive. > > > > FYI this package has been pulled already. > > Doesn't that require a announcement? We did that for Xara. /me shrugs I didn't explicitly do the pull. An announcement is certainly justified, I just would have thought the packager would do it. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
