On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 12:05 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 12:00:52 Robin Norwood wrote: > > Well, the buildroots currently have 'perl-devel' because we made 'perl' > > Require 'perl-devel' - which is obviously wrong for the long term, but > > in the short term fixed the builds. What we're doing now is further > > splitting things out so there will be more packages, *and* removing the > > Requires. There's been some further discussion on > > fedora-perl-devel-list about this, and the alternative is to *not* add > > the new packages to the buildroots, and just have people fix their > > packages. Not to be a total weathervane here, but personally I'd just > > as soon not add the packages to the buildroots, and fix the broken > > packages now. I just don't feel like I have enough of a feel for which > > option people will prefer to make a call. So, if you have an opinion, > > speak up now. > > Personally I think it's rather late in the game to be doing such things, > especially because we only have one test release to get things right and the > final to correct what we got wrong. I'd rather see the rest of this split > happen after F-7 is branched off devel/ and focus on getting it right in > devel/ _Immediately_ after F7 is branched, please. - ajax -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
