Patrice Dumas writes: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:28:48AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > > Patrice Dumas writes: > > > > This is exhausting. Please explain why the soname scheme does not > > work for changes in the compiler as well as for changes in the > > library! > > Maybe it does, but is it that way that such issues should be handled > in fedora? changing soname upon a compiler-related ABI breaking leads > to following another soname versionning scheme than upstream, I doubt > this is right, and I don't think such issues are handled that way in > fedora. Maybe I'm having difficulty understanding you. Is the problem that a Red Hat compiler version is binary incompatible with the upstream compiler? And we have not handled library versioning correctly? Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
