Patrice Dumas writes: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:23:46AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > > Patrice Dumas writes: > > > > > > Sometimes changes in the compiler leads to binary incompatibility. How > > > to deal with these kind of incompatibilitites? I don't think that using > > > the soname for those kind of incompatibilities is right, are there other > > > technniques? > > > > The soname is the right way to do it. Why do you believe otherwise? > > It seemed to me that the soname was used to track the ABI compatibility > issues arising from changes in the library. Yes. > This means using the upstream soname scheme (at least when it is > not broken). That's right. So what is the problem you want to solve? Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
