On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 19:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > This isn't really a issue for fedora core development list, well, until > > >you have a drop in replacement for yum (which might be a little while > > >off I think). > > I don't think the above is quite fair -- developing tools for Fedora is > certainly on topic. Even for non-advanced programmers. > +1. Alternative depsolvers and discussion on how we should be doing that should definitely happen here or on other package-mgmt-related lists. However, a fair bit of this discussion would be best suited by various parties reading about rpm's version comparison and yum's dependency resolution methods before commenting on their virtue or vice. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
