On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:06:31PM -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote: > I just got a bunch of the above mails. How about we implement auto > detecting this for bugzilla? Seems like all we need is some logic that > does something like: > if egrep "Fedora.*\.fc([0-9]+)\b" useragent then > if relevant bugzilla version exists then > auto choose relevant version > else > auto choose devel This would seriously save me effort in future releases. :) > And why do test1, test2, test3 even exist? Can we remove them if bugs > should not be filed there? Yes, that's the plan. I'm going through the last of them right now. In a few minutes, there will be no bugs against any test release (test# or fc#test#) that aren't in either CLOSED or NEEDINFO. I'm also going to go through the test# NEEDINFOs and see what should be moved and what should just be closed now. Then, after a waiting period of a few more weeks, move all NEEDINFO fc#test#s to their corresponding final release, marked INSUFFICIENT_DATA. At that point, someone @redhat.com can bulk-move all the CLOSED test# and fc#test# bugs somewhere (ideally in the database rather than the front end to avoid completely useless bugzilla mail spew and because of how long this would take). And *then*, all the test release versions can and should be removed. PS: thanks to all the owners humoring me as I stir up hornets under their bug reports. :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
