On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 07:10 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 09 April 2007 23:44:07 Tom Lane wrote: > > Just outta curiosity, why is it not considered an RPM bug that every > > specfile has to take care of this detail? Seems like it'd be trivial > > to fix it once instead of memorializing this oversight in every package > > till the end of time. > > It's not that we don't consider it a bug, it's that we don't feel that this > bug can be "fixed" in rpm any time soon. There are far bigger issues that > our RPM team are trying to tackle. So until such time that it is fixed in > rpm, we still have to manage it correctly within our specs. Same with > buildroot, etc... Oh come on. This is a 5 line change in rpm, at most... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
