On Monday 09 April 2007 23:44:07 Tom Lane wrote: > Just outta curiosity, why is it not considered an RPM bug that every > specfile has to take care of this detail? Seems like it'd be trivial > to fix it once instead of memorializing this oversight in every package > till the end of time. It's not that we don't consider it a bug, it's that we don't feel that this bug can be "fixed" in rpm any time soon. There are far bigger issues that our RPM team are trying to tackle. So until such time that it is fixed in rpm, we still have to manage it correctly within our specs. Same with buildroot, etc... -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpGkgyYbs4Z9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
