On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:41:52PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > Ok, but again, "MTA" only if talking about Provides. No need to touch > the "mta" update-alternatives name. I was also speaking about the Provides. > To clarify, with "mail" you mean either of /bin/mail (executable) or mailx > (package)? I'd say /bin/mail. That way this will still work if another package provides the command. > > And use smtpdameon when a real > > smtp server/Mail Transfer Agent is needed ? > > That would work too, leaving only semantics of "Provides: smtpdaemon" to be > documented, and that provision probably removed from ssmtp. And going > through packages that have dependencies on smtpdaemon, fixing where > appropriate. Exactly. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
