On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:35:26AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 09 April 2007 11:10:49 Ville Skyttä wrote: > > Use of the "mta" alternative seems to be in order, but I thought the > > "correct" way to fix the rest would be to add "Provides: MTA" to sendmail > > and esmtp, and remove "Provides: smtpdaemon" from ssmtp. This way the > > "mta" alternative and "MTA" Provides would be in sync, and only things that > > actually run SMTP daemons would provide "smtpdaemon". > > Looks more to me like 'MTA' is an accident and should be removed in favor of > leaving just "mta". All things that require 'MTA' should be fixed for > just 'mta'. Wouldn't it be better to remove completly mta/MTA but instead use /usr/sbin/sendmail or mail as Requires? And use smtpdameon when a real smtp server/Mail Transfer Agent is needed ? -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
