Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It is not worth the effort for Anaconda and many other tools. Sure, if you think KDE users aren't worth having an efficient Fedora system. Loading two different graphic frameworks at the same time wastes memory/diskspace, slows down startup time, and leads to graphical inconsistencies. For people with low-end hardware that makes a huge difference. > There are other KDE focussed distributions which have used GTK based > tools like Mandriva. That's a suboptimal solution, originating from a lack of foresight in designing those applications to separate the core functionality from the GUI components. I would point to K/Ubuntu as an example where desktop integration is tackled correctly: for every system tool there is a KDE or GNOME frontend to be used on the respective desktop, and the core functionality is shared in a common backend. > If you disagree put in the effort. The only reason I mentioned the lack of KDE frontends for system tools in Fedora is that a potential developer with Qt background asked where he can help. Vlad ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
