On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 13:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Steven Bakker wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 08:17 +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > > >> I'm the maintainer of JPGraph in Fedora (a php graphing library). I thought > >> its licence was QPL by reading this: > >> http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/jpdownload.php > >> but apparently I misread it and jpgraph is only Free for non-commercial use. > >> JPGraph used to be fully QPL a long time ago, but that changed. > > > > Actually, the text reads: > > > > JpGraph is released under a dual license. QPL 1.0 (Qt Free > > Licensee) For non-commercial, open-source or educational use and > > JpGraph Professional License for commercial use. > > > > So QPL applies for (non-commercial || open-source || educational) use. > > I'd say Fedora fits in the "open-source" category. > > It might. However the wording appears to attempt to classify open source > along with non commercial and educational sort of projects while it > might very well be used commercially or be part of a larger commercial > product. > > Considering what we have things like EPEL, we definitely need a > clarification from the authors. Agreed. Without additional clarification, I would recommend removing it from the repository. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
