Steven Bakker wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 08:17 +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
I'm the maintainer of JPGraph in Fedora (a php graphing library). I thought
its licence was QPL by reading this:
http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/jpdownload.php
but apparently I misread it and jpgraph is only Free for non-commercial use.
JPGraph used to be fully QPL a long time ago, but that changed.
Actually, the text reads:
JpGraph is released under a dual license. QPL 1.0 (Qt Free
Licensee) For non-commercial, open-source or educational use and
JpGraph Professional License for commercial use.
So QPL applies for (non-commercial || open-source || educational) use.
I'd say Fedora fits in the "open-source" category.
It might. However the wording appears to attempt to classify open source
along with non commercial and educational sort of projects while it
might very well be used commercially or be part of a larger commercial
product.
Considering what we have things like EPEL, we definitely need a
clarification from the authors.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
