Re: sysvinit VS initng VS upstart VS launchd (Was: Future New Init for FC7?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> dragoran dragoran wrote:
> 
> >     All the init systems should be parallel installable, so the choice is
> >     only for the default init system. 
> > 
> > if we go this route system-config-services should support multiple
> > backends....
> 
> ...and many packages should contain multiple init scripts for those
> systems that dropped sysvinit compatibility (like initng).

Sure, if there is somebody wanting to go that route, let's not stop
them.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux