Re: sysvinit VS initng VS upstart VS launchd (Was: Future New Init for FC7?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:37:10PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> 
> LSB had just finished standardizing the init scripts and now we're
> going to break things again.  Users *are* going to complain.
> Analysts *are* going to say Linux is fragmented.  Microsoft *is*
> going to publish studies saying that Linux has higher TCO because
> of multiple init systems ;-)
> 
> This doesn't mean there should be a single codebase.  Multiple
> systems could compete as long as they are 100% (or maybe just 99%)
> compatible config files and user interface.

All the init systems should be parallel installable, so the choice is
only for the default init system.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux