On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 12:32 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Then its not a noarch package. while it does not compile it is arch specific > and should be treated as such. I agree. A clearly arch specific package should not be noarch, that seems like common sense to me. Making it noarch appears to require hacks, a sure sign of doing something wrong...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
