On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 09:51:25AM +0200, Michal Marciniszyn wrote: > Hi, > > Our first step should be to produce guidelines (we have some for RHEL, > but they are not obeyed), then force the developers to obey that. It is > no big deal, but having all scripts behaving correctly and in some sense > the standard way is definitely good think. I completely agree. Having glanced through the specification there is one point that doesn't seems to be desirable, it is the script naming scheme which seems ugly to me: http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/scrptnames.html Although it could be a SHOULD item that upstream is contacted to register to the lanana. The other points seems right to me. Maybe you could put up a proposal in the wiki and bring it to the packaging commitee on the fedora-packaging list? There are already some items covered in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-b638e19c644263af59762a3154a60554a8303bb3 -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
