On 27.03.2007 12:46, Richard Hughes wrote: > >> in X? Especially using plain VGA or framebuffer seems to influence the >> options that are needed to bring the video device back to work a lot in >> my experience. > That's the plan. Without X we are sunk. /me wonders who'll be the first that says "X is overrated; 80 colums and 24 (25?) lines is more then enough to run irssi" >> Side note: Ubuntu and Suse both use framebuffer, Fedora a plain text >> console normally; so a quirk that works on Fedora maybe doesn't help on >> Suse (or the other way around). > Well, all this is very new. The very least we will achieve is to get > screens to turn back on when they come back from suspend, i.e. to DPMS > on where needed, and to poke vbetool and restore vbestate. Some other > odd quirks like radeontool are present, but completely untested. Well, we'll see how it evolves. Anyway: thx for your great work Richard! > [...] CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
