On 27.03.2007 12:08, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 06:03 -0400, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> hal-0.5.9-0.git20070326.fc7 >> --------------------------- >> * Mon Mar 26 2007 David Zeuthen <davidz@xxxxxxxxxx> - >> 0.5.9-0.git20070326 >> - Update to hal 0.5.9rc2 and hal-info-20070326 > These *need* to be split into separate SRPMS. I don't mind > co-maintaining these if you want, but if we are updating machine quirks > once a month or so, [...] BTW regarding all those machine quirks to make suspend "simply work": - is there any coordination with the people behind s2ram? - for the video related quirks: are you differentiating if the systems where those quirks got tested run -- vesa framebuffer -- chip-specific framebuffer driver -- plain vga (vga=0) on the console and -- free X drivers -- proprietary display drivers in X? Especially using plain VGA or framebuffer seems to influence the options that are needed to bring the video device back to work a lot in my experience. Side note: Ubuntu and Suse both use framebuffer, Fedora a plain text console normally; so a quirk that works on Fedora maybe doesn't help on Suse (or the other way around). Just wondering. I like the idea to make suspend "simply work" a lot ;-) CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
