Re: kernel config question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Woodhouse (dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > It's 'port the installer to use hal & udev', there's not a bug
> > number, probably because it's generally understood that it's not
> > happening right now.
> 
> OK, so since the above workaround only removes some environment
> variables which were being passed to the hotplug/udev script, it
> shouldn't matter that they're now missing, because the installer wasn't
> using them anyway?

!CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED changes the sysfs layout significantly. (Hey,
when they say the kernel doesn't have a fixed ABI, they aren't kidding.)

This breaks the hardware detection logic used by the installer in about
five or six different places.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux