On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:53 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > David Woodhouse (dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Any reason why CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is set? Which user land bits > > > still need this? Is work being done to eliminate the need for this? > > > > Hopefully. It's causing oopses. We should ideally have bugs filed for > > anything in userspace which needs it. > > It's causing oopses, so we should fix userspace because the kernel is > busted? Because a _deprecated_ feature in the kernel is busted, you mean? The answer would be 'maybe'. I can't say; I don't know what needs it. I have a crappy workaround which disables _some_ of what CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED does, but I don't know if that's the bit which this obsolete userspace stuff is using. > It's known what needs it, it's unlikely to be fixed before F7. Bug numbers or more details? The workaround of which I speak is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227893#c9 -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
