sön 2007-03-11 klockan 11:14 +1100 skrev Andrew Bartlett: > The reason I ask is that I've been looking at the Fedora DS situation > (now a package in extras), where every binary is wrapped in a shell > script to munge the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which just seems wrong to me. Yeah, it would be better to use RPATH. If a process needs LD_LIBRARY_PATH set, but spawns other processes that do not need it, it's asking for trouble. (For example, a web browser that starts a PDF reader.) /abo -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
